<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best Outlook Folder system in the world is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardmaybury.co.uk/2010/02/the-best-outlook-folder-system-in-the-world-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardmaybury.co.uk/2010/02/the-best-outlook-folder-system-in-the-world-is/</link>
	<description>Insights and hindsights on living purposefully, working productively, driving results, giving and getting more out of life. CALL: +44 (0)1428 607763</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Maybury</title>
		<link>http://richardmaybury.co.uk/2010/02/the-best-outlook-folder-system-in-the-world-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Maybury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priorityattitudes.com/?p=1294#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>HI Kevin, thanks for bringing this information to us.
It looks interesting.
Our training approach helps people manage multiple mini projects within Outlook simply through leveraging the Contacts and Category functionalities within Outlook without any add-ons.
I have approved your post because I&#039;m always interested in opening up new ideas to my readers.
I will check out your approach more fully at a later time. Meanwhile do keep in touch, especially with any enhancements, updates or case studies
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Kevin, thanks for bringing this information to us.<br />
It looks interesting.<br />
Our training approach helps people manage multiple mini projects within Outlook simply through leveraging the Contacts and Category functionalities within Outlook without any add-ons.<br />
I have approved your post because I&#8217;m always interested in opening up new ideas to my readers.<br />
I will check out your approach more fully at a later time. Meanwhile do keep in touch, especially with any enhancements, updates or case studies<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Moore</title>
		<link>http://richardmaybury.co.uk/2010/02/the-best-outlook-folder-system-in-the-world-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priorityattitudes.com/?p=1294#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>Hi,

In case you or some of your readers are interested, I&#039;ve created an add-in that incorporates project management into Microsoft Outlook.

All of your project base emails, files, contacts, tasks and appointments are managed in a central, easy to use location.

You can find more information on our web-site: &lt;a href=&quot;www.missinglinkprojectcenter.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Outlook Project Management&lt;/a&gt;

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>In case you or some of your readers are interested, I&#8217;ve created an add-in that incorporates project management into Microsoft Outlook.</p>
<p>All of your project base emails, files, contacts, tasks and appointments are managed in a central, easy to use location.</p>
<p>You can find more information on our web-site: <a href="www.missinglinkprojectcenter.com" rel="nofollow">Outlook Project Management</a></p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Maybury</title>
		<link>http://richardmaybury.co.uk/2010/02/the-best-outlook-folder-system-in-the-world-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Maybury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priorityattitudes.com/?p=1294#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>Cool, Mark. I see you come at this from the minimalist school, as do I to a point.

One of my colleagues has gone one step further. He works his 4D decisions on new emails in his inbox and then drags everything he wants to keep into one main subfolder he names &#039;Stuff&#039;&#039; and then he uses desktop search to find what he is looking for. 

I&#039;m not quite there  but I have been on a mission to reduce subfolder usage over the past year or so. 

I have always thought it just makes sense to map my outlook folders to my &#039;My Document&#039; folders and am always surprised that this is very much the exception with the people we support.
Thanks for your contribution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, Mark. I see you come at this from the minimalist school, as do I to a point.</p>
<p>One of my colleagues has gone one step further. He works his 4D decisions on new emails in his inbox and then drags everything he wants to keep into one main subfolder he names &#8216;Stuff&#8221; and then he uses desktop search to find what he is looking for. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite there  but I have been on a mission to reduce subfolder usage over the past year or so. </p>
<p>I have always thought it just makes sense to map my outlook folders to my &#8216;My Document&#8217; folders and am always surprised that this is very much the exception with the people we support.<br />
Thanks for your contribution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bower (Connectegrity)</title>
		<link>http://richardmaybury.co.uk/2010/02/the-best-outlook-folder-system-in-the-world-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1666</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bower (Connectegrity)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priorityattitudes.com/?p=1294#comment-1666</guid>
		<description>Oops that would be 2007...how time flies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops that would be 2007&#8230;how time flies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bower (Connectegrity)</title>
		<link>http://richardmaybury.co.uk/2010/02/the-best-outlook-folder-system-in-the-world-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bower (Connectegrity)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priorityattitudes.com/?p=1294#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>I wrote about my approach (http://blogs.msdn.com/bowerm/archive/2007/01/09/new-year-new-low-cal-outlook.aspx) back in 2008. I haven&#039;t looked back since. 
There&#039;s a psychological leap to get over, but trust me, it&#039;s the biggest time saver ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about my approach (<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/bowerm/archive/2007/01/09/new-year-new-low-cal-outlook.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/bowerm/archive/2007/01/09/new-year-new-low-cal-outlook.aspx</a>) back in 2008. I haven&#8217;t looked back since.<br />
There&#8217;s a psychological leap to get over, but trust me, it&#8217;s the biggest time saver ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

